Showing posts with label Tom Tancredo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Tancredo. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Tancredo sends head of lettuce to Chertoff

WASHINGTON (CNN) — It’s not every day a presidential hopeful sends Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff a head of lettuce, but that’s what Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colorado, is doing Wednesday to show his disagreement with Chertoff’s recent comments on how failure of passing immigration reform might affect the agricultural industry.

Tancredo says he disagrees with recent comments Chertoff made that suggested if the immigration bill fails, the agricultural industry will suffer. To prove his point he is sending Chertoff a head of lettuce, a fruit basket, and a card saying, “much, much more where this comes from.”

“The administration has taken hyperbole to a whole new level this time,” Tancredo said in a statement. “They are now trying to convince the public that without amnesty, the American people are going to starve?”

“The agriculture industry and the free market has managed to keep producing through floods, droughts, and $3.00 per gallon gas,” Tancredo added, “I doubt very seriously that a nominal increase in labor costs is going to be the end of lettuce as we know it.”

In a July 14 speech before the National Council of Farmer Cooperatives, Chertoff said, “Without reform that brings workers in legitimately, that makes it efficient for businesses, including agricultural businesses, to hire those workers efficiently, and without some kind of a mechanism to promote agriculture and to deal with the current illegal work force, we’re going to put people like you and those you represent in a terrible bind — they’re either going to have to break the law, which is a bad thing to do, or they’re going to have to shut down their farms, which is a bad thing to do, or what’s going to wind up happening is those farms are going to Mexico and Canada.”

– CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

GOP Presidential Candidates - round 2

10 candidates, 90 minutes, 3 questioners... a recipe for some exciting television and that it was...

Eight months before the first ballot is cast, the GOP hopefuls battled it out on the second republican debate. This time around the tone harder and the attacks were flying.

Rudy Giuliani was the nights big winner showing all his strengths on national security and trying to prove his conservative credentials, not on social issues, but fiscal and security issues. His biggest shinning moment of the night came after a statement from Ron Paul insinuating that America invited the attacks of 9/11. Giuliani rose quickly to call out Ron Paul in a "no you didn't" moment, asking Congressman Paul how he dared make that sort of statement. Giuliani said, he had heard some extraordinary statements in his time but that was one of the most extraordinary thing he has ever heard. The viewers in the audience and those at home could see the resolve in Giuliani's face and how personal he took the issue. Giuliani received roaring applause from the audience and asked Ron Paul to apologize for his statement.

Giuliani also won by switching the debate in his favor, he tried to deflect his position on abortion as ask the public to see the big picture, if the Republicans loose, we get Hillary, and that is truly a scary America.

Senator John McCain did amazing will as well, proving himself as a constant leaders and American patriot. The Senator showed to be a proven national leader, someone who worked with both sides of the aisle to get results and even came off funny with his drunken sailor joke. (though he has given it a few times, much of America hadn't seen it yet.) McCain was able to attack his fellow top tier candidates, including Mitt Rommney for being a flip flopper on issues, saying he did not change his "position on even-numbered years" or "because of the different offices that I may be running for." McCain tried to strengthen the publics view of his conservative credentials talking about immigration, taxes and the war. The Senator started the night saying he would be the last man standing supporting the war.

This was not Gov. Mitt Rommney's debate. He won the first but fell flat this time around. He did get quite a few hard questions (5 I think). He had to defend his abortion position throughout the night and his conservative credentials. Rommney did give a few jabs himself, attacking McCain saying "McCain-Kennedy would do to immigration what McCain-Fiengold did to campaigns," yet McCain came back strong. Romney did win with his comments on keeping Gitmo open, which got huge applause from the crowd.

The debate was truly a battle of the big three with the rest of the field trying to show America they were the "real conservative" candidate. Tom Tancredo missed some opportunities. Gov. Jim Gilmore personally attacked some candidates, after the prodding of questioner Mike Wallace, but it was "ehh". Mike Huckabee came off funny, likable and defiantly stood out from the lower tier candidates, but wasn't the overall winner. (He had a very funny line about Edwards.) Ron Paul clearly was remembered by the end of the debate, but less for his positions, and more on his situation with Rudy Giuliani during the debate.

Early in the night Fox News was showing Ron Paul as the debates winner, which is ludicrous. Maybe it was joke, as Rudy was the nights real winner.

Read more about the debate:
- Politico's Jonathan Martin's Republican Blog
- Washington Post: Analysis of Second GOP Debate
- Giuliani Scores Big Debate Moment

Thursday, May 3, 2007

What to Watch For Tonight

Tonight the Republican candidates for President are going to battle it out for who is the "RIGHT-ful" hire to Regan's Republican Party.... or something like that....

With the first GOP Presidential debate properly taking place at the Ronald Regan Library in California and Nancy Regan sitting front and center, as if overseeing the events in place of her husband, it should prove to be an interesting first glimpse of the candidates.

As we try to guess who will do what, here are some personal analysis: ALL of them are going to try to establish themselves as the ONLY person to continue the Regan legacy. (We wonder how many times will the candidates evoke Ronald Regan's name?) There will be little prise for Bush. Between the 10 candidates we have a huge diversifications of opinion from far right to right of center.

The Leaders: We are expecting the front runners -McCain, Giuliani, Romney - are going to keep it simple, try not to mess up and look VERY presidential. This philosophy was best stated by Mitt Romney last night on the "Tonight Show" with Jay Leno saying, "It's going to be very short. Get on, get off. Keep your hair from getting messed up." Romney has the most to gain from this debate. He has an opportunity to show the public why so many Washington insiders love him. McCain can win here by reminding people why they supported him in the past. (He is up in Iowa, NH and SC). Giuliani has the most to loose as he is up in the numbers and he can't messed up.

Stuck In The Middle/Underdogs: They are going to try to stand out and provide a few zingers to get a moment in the spotlight. Some of these candidates are gaining less then 1% of the vote in many national polls. In reality, many of these candidates won't be contenders in a few months, with the primaries moving earlier each day, this might be the only time these candidates will have a time to shine and try to garner support from the public.

One-Issue Candidates: These guys are not only underdogs but known for their "passion" on a one particular issue, we expect them to continue their platform while trying to spread their wings a little. Rep. Ron Paul is known for his ideology and feels the party has lost its way on its libertarian traditions. Rep. Tom Tancredo has gained national recognition for his strict position on immigration and his anti-immigration stands.

Looking for a "Gravel" Moment: Tancredo, Duncan Hunter or maybe Huckabee?

Missing In Action: Newt Gingrich hasn't declared and we don't know when he will. Senator Hagel had a press conference to confirm he was thinking about it, but we haven't the foggiest when we will decide. Former Senator and current actor Fred Thompson is expected to have a "roll out" in July. Fred Thompson has been coming high in the polls, sometimes as high as 3rd or 4th, amazing for a person who hasn't even announced.

A bigger question for us is, will the Hispanic Vote and Immigration reform come up in a debate in California? Will the example of Pete Wilson and his negative effects of the GOP in California come up? We hope so...

From the Hotline On Call they listed some things everyone should be looking for:
  1. Comparisons between anti-communism and the war on terror (or the "war of terror").
  2. Mitt Romney's mentions of "McCain-Kennedy" and "McCain-Feingold"
  3. Mike Huckabee's attempt to distinguish himself as the "authentic conservative" in the field.
  4. A debate about climate change, starring John McCain and Mitt Romney
  5. Tepid praise for Pres. Bush
  6. Standard Reaganesque themes: lower taxes, stronger national defense
  7. Implicit criticism of the 109th Congress and its leaders
  8. Denial: those Republicans who assert that '06 had little to do with the war
  9. Praise for -- and criticism of -- Hillary Clinton. (a Chris Matthews obsession).
  10. An unusual focus on religious conservatives in South Carolina
  11. Let's make a prediction: no Mormon question. That'd be refreshing.
  12. "Battlefield Earth" jokes.
  13. Lots of Pelosi/Reid bashing.
  14. Sentences beginning with "Ronald Reagan thought..." or "Ronald Reagan knew..."
  15. Assertions that America is fundamentally conservative and wants its leaders to be fundamentally conservative.
  16. Questions about Fred Thompson and his significance to the GOP field
  17. Reminders about the "11th commandment" -- Reagan's suggestion that Republicans shalt not attack one another.